dMedia Logo
Subscribe
Back to Home
Analysis

Look to the International Organization for Migration

@DaleStarkA10, asked which NGO enabled these Somalis to operate scams in the U.S. The real question is: who brought them to the United States in the first place? One major player is the International Organization for Migration (IOM). IOM received approximately $114 million to facilitate the relocation of Somalis to the U.S. One specific grant alone totaled $45 million—exactly as you’d expect—earmarked for the “Transition Initiative for Somalia.” This grant was authorized and funded by USAID. @DataRepublican @nickshirleyy @elonmusk @nicksortor @MarioNawfal @WallStreetApes @JDVance

Steven Al Ebadi
December 29, 2025

Related

Inconsistent Outrage over Military Actions
Analysis

Inconsistent Outrage over Military Actions

How Obama Dropped over 26K bombs on 7 countries without congress approval Just in 2016. Even @snopes reported on this. In 2016 alone, then–U.S. President Barack Obama authorized more than 26,000 airstrikes across seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen. This figure is based on data from the U.S. Air Force, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Long War Journal, and the New America Foundation. Obama did not seek a new act of Congress to carry out these military operations. While his actions were not deemed illegal, they relied heavily on the broad 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), originally passed to target al-Qaida and the Taliban in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Over time, that authorization was expanded to justify strikes against militant groups that either did not exist on Sept. 11, 2001, or were not formally affiliated with al-Qaida. This practice is not unique to the Obama administration. U.S. presidents have routinely conducted military operations without explicit congressional approval, and President Donald Trump similarly cited the 2001 AUMF to justify military actions during his first term. @RepThomasMassie @RandPaul @DataRepublican @RepJeffries @TheDemocrats @mattvanswol @PeteHegseth @marcorubio @GenFlynn @DonaldJTrumpJr There was no outrage back then. Why now?

Steven Al Ebadi
January 05, 2026
Criminal Nephews Put Back into the Public by Biden Administration
Analysis

Criminal Nephews Put Back into the Public by Biden Administration

The Biden Admin released Nicolas Maduros Nephews: 1- Efraín Antonio Campo Flores (also known as Efraín Campo Flores). Raised by Cilia Flores after his mother's death, he is sometimes described as her adopted or stepson. He grew up in the presidential household. 2- Franqui Francisco Flores de Freitas (also known as Francisco Flores de Freitas or Franqui Flores) Cilia Flores' cousin-nephew. In November 2015, they were arrested in Haiti by U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents during a sting operation while attempting to arrange the transport of 800 kg of cocaine to the United States. They were convicted in a U.S. federal court in 2016 of conspiracy to import cocaine, and each sentenced to 18 years in prison in 2017. Evidence included recorded meetings where they discussed using the presidential hangar at Venezuela's main airport and claimed the drug proceeds would help "keep the family in power" (potentially funding Cilia Flores' political activities). In October 2022, they were released in a U.S.-Venezuela prisoner swap for seven detained Americans (including CITGO executives) and returned to Venezuela. @DataRepublican @sarahadams @PeteHegseth @StealthMedical1 @JDVance

Steven Al Ebadi
January 04, 2026
Professional Protestor Economics
Analysis

Professional Protestor Economics

We will be finding out that this is the cycle: 1. Taxpayer money and remittances go to foreign countries. Remittances are the big part; immigrants simply aren't hardwired for individualism like we are so they feel obligated to wire huge shares of their grift back to their country. 2. And here's the critical part: these foreign countries operate just like ours. Immigrants often think they're donating to a mosque or nonprofit or whatever, but in fact they're going to a foreign NGO. 3. Foreign NGO donates directly to Actblue, because American cover is what gives them legitimacy. 4. Actblue kicks back to Democratic politicians and donates to various 501(c)(3) which then pay these professional protesters under the table.

Jennica Pounds
January 11, 2026